Litcius/Paper detail

Evaluation of the Consistency of ECMWF Ensemble Forecasts

David Richardson, Hannah Cloke, Florian Pappenberger

2020Geophysical Research Letters21 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract An expected benefit of ensemble forecasts is that a sequence of consecutive forecasts valid for the same time will be more consistent than an equivalent sequence of individual forecasts. Inconsistent (jumpy) forecasts can cause users to lose confidence in the forecasting system. We present a first systematic, objective evaluation of the consistency of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ensemble using a measure of forecast divergence that takes account of the full ensemble distribution. Focusing on forecasts of the North Atlantic Oscillation and European Blocking regimes up to 2 weeks ahead, we identify occasional large inconsistency between successive runs, with the largest jumps tending to occur at 7–9 days lead. However, care is needed in the interpretation of ensemble jumpiness. An apparent clear flip‐flop in a single index may hide a more complex predictability issue which may be better understood by examining the ensemble evolution in phase space.

Topics & Concepts

PredictabilityEnsemble forecastingConsistency (knowledge bases)EconometricsDivergence (linguistics)Consensus forecastClimatologyRange (aeronautics)Ensemble averageSequence (biology)MeteorologyEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceStatisticsMathematicsGeologyGeographyArtificial intelligenceGeneticsComposite materialMaterials scienceBiologyLinguisticsPhilosophyClimate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics