Litcius/Paper detail

Evaluating transparency in AI/ML model characteristics for FDA-reviewed medical devices

Viraj Mehta, Abhinav Komanduri, Rishabh Singh Bhadouriya, Vilina Mehta, Michael D. Johnson, Priyanka Shrestha, Margaret C. Nikolov, Bhav Jain, Nigam H. Shah, Kevin A. Schulman

2025npj Digital Medicine16 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into medical devices has underscored the need for transparency in regulatory reporting. In 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Good Machine Learning Practice (GMLP) principles, but adherence in FDA-reviewed devices remains uncertain. We reviewed 1,012 summaries of safety and effectiveness (SSEDs) for AI/ML-enabled devices approved or cleared by the FDA between 1970 and December 2024. Transparency in model development and performance was assessed using a novel AI Characteristics Transparency Reporting (ACTR) score across 17 categories. The average ACTR score was 3.3 out of 17, with modest improvement by 0.88 points (95% CI, 0.54-1.23) after the 2021 guidelines. Nearly half of devices did not report a clinical study and over half did not report any performance metric. These findings highlight transparency gaps and emphasize the need for enforceable standards to ensure trust in AI/ML medical technologies.

Topics & Concepts

Transparency (behavior)ClearanceFood and drug administrationBusinessComputer scienceAccountingRisk analysis (engineering)MedicineMedical deviceClinical PracticeMedical practiceActuarial scienceData scienceMEDLINEProcess managementKnowledge managementAccountabilityArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIBiomedical Ethics and Regulation