Litcius/Paper detail

Engagement Among Diverse Patient Backgrounds in a Remote Symptom Monitoring Program

Gabrielle B. Rocque, Nicole E. Caston, Keyonsis Hildreth, Luqin Deng, Nicole L. Henderson, Courtney Williams, Andrés Azuero, Bradford E. Jackson, Jeffrey Franks, Chelsea McGowan, Chao‐Hui Huang, D’Ambra Dent, Stacey A. Ingram, J. Nicholas Dionne‐Odom, Noon Eltoum, Bryan J. Weiner, Doris Howell, Angela M. Stover, Jennifer Young Pierce, Ethan Basch

2024JCO Oncology Practice25 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous randomized controlled trials have demonstrated benefit from remote symptom monitoring (RSM) with electronic patient-reported outcomes. However, the racial diversity of enrolled patients was low and did not reflect the real-world racial proportions for individuals with cancer. METHODS: This secondary, cross-sectional analysis evaluated engagement of patients with cancer in a RSM program. Patient-reported race was grouped as Black, Other, or White. Patient address was used to map patient residence to determine rurality using Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes and neighborhood disadvantage using Area Deprivation Index. Key outcomes included (1) being approached for RSM enrollment, (2) declining enrollment, (3) adherence with RSM via continuous completion of symptom surveys, and (4) withdrawal from RSM participation. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% CI were estimated from modified Poisson models with robust SEs. RESULTS: Between May 2021 and May 2023, 883 patients were approached to participate, of which 56 (6%) declined RSM. Of those who enrolled in RSM, a total of 27% of patients were Black or African American and 67% were White. In adjusted models, all patient population subgroups of interest had similar likelihoods of being approached for RSM participation; however, Black or African American patients were more than 3× more likely to decline participation than White participants (RR, 3.09 [95% CI, 1.73 to 5.53]). Patients living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods were less likely to decline (RR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.24 to 1.02]), but less likely to adhere to surveys (RR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.68 to 0.97]). All patient populations had a similar likelihood of withdrawing. CONCLUSION: Black patients and individuals living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods are at risk for lower engagement in RSM. Further work is needed to identify and overcome barriers to equitable participation.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineRuralityDisadvantagedDemographyPoisson regressionResidencePopulationGerontologyRural areaEnvironmental healthLawSociologyPolitical sciencePathologyCancer survivorship and careDigital Mental Health InterventionsGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Engagement Among Diverse Patient Backgrounds in a Remote Symptom Monitoring Program | Litcius