Litcius/Paper detail

Iatrogenic dermatitis in times of COVID‐19: a pandemic within a pandemic

Riti Bhatia, Tekumalla Sindhuja, Saurabh Bhatia, Tanvi Dev, A. K. Gupta, Swati Bajpai, Somesh Gupta

2020Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology54 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Editor The pandemic of the 21st century COVID-19 emerged in Wuhan, China, and swiftly became a global phenomenon. The frontline barriers for preventing spread are hand hygiene and personal protective equipment (PPE). The amplified hygiene practices and PPE as recommended have brought in its wake a second pandemic – a pandemic of dermatitis!1 We reviewed the most prevalent types of iatrogenic skin damage among healthcare workers (HCWs), notably irritant, and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to PPE and hand hygiene measures, as well as face mask induced pressure-related skin damage.2-4 The prevalence of occupational skin disease among HCWs in earlier studies (pre-COVID era) has been estimated to range from 20 to 50%.5 However, in two recent studies from Hubei, China, a staggeringly higher number of HCWs (97%, n = 526/542 and 71%, n = 234/330) HCWs engaged in the care of COVID-19 patients reported self-perceived skin barrier damage.2, 6 Majority experienced skin dryness/tightness (70.3%) and desquamation (62.2%) commonly occurring on the nasal bridge (83.1%) (Fig. 1).2 Skin damage was more prevalent among HCWs wearing N95 masks and goggles for more than 6 h a day, whereas the face shield produced no such effect on prolonged wearing. Goggles were reported as the commonest (51.92%) culprit among PPE and about a fifth of patients reported work absenteeism because of dermatitis.3 Face mask and headgear worn tightly for prolonged hours result in ACD, ICD, pressure urticaria, friction dermatitis, abrasions and aggravation of pre-existing dermatoses.6 N95 respirators may contain formaldehyde, a known allergen.7 Retro-auricular skin is vulnerable to frictional dermatitis due to ear loops of the facemasks.4 Frequent hand washing (>10 times daily) increased the risk of skin damage more than prolonged wearing of gloves. Hand hygiene-associated dermatitis usually manifests on the knuckles and web spaces, where these irritants and allergens accumulate. Occasionally, both ICD and ACD can coexist. ACD to gloves presents with erythematous itchy plaques on convexities of dorsal surface of hands with a clear demarcation of erythema at wrists (Fig. 1).6 Contact dermatitis to various PPEs and hand hygiene measures can occur due to a variety of factors involving irritants and allergens in these agents, compounded by moisture, occlusion, friction, cold dry weather and atopic predisposition of an individual. These exposures lead to ICD and ACD through changes involving the skin barrier, cells and cytokines. Excessive hand hygiene depletes skin commensals that play an important role in Th1, Th2 and Th17 balance.8 Patch test is the gold standard for diagnosis of ACD. The battery of allergens includes standard series, textile series, fragrance series, masks, gloves and hand cleansers used by the patients. Some allergens relevant to SARS-CoV-2 pandemic viz 1,3 diphenyl guanidine, DMDM hydantoin, propylene glycol, formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers may not be present in a single series. ACD to glove allergens also is commonly reported (Table 1).7 N95 respirator or filtering face piece (FFP) FFP 1 FFP 2 FFP 3 (highest level of protection) Glove powder- cornstarch based Sterilization of gloves by gamma irradiation can increase bacterial endotoxin level, which is water soluble and can be absorbed onto glove powder leading to irritation Synthetic rubber gloves- Nitrile gloves Vinyl gloves Neoprene gloves Ethanol, n-propranolol, isopropanolol, chlorhexidine, chloroxylenol, triclosan Healthcare workers education about hand hygiene measures combined with liberal moisturizing for skin barrier repair, avoidance of suspected allergens, ergonomic workplace interventions and emphasizing the need for redesigning PPE is vital in tackling this iatrogenic health hazard. Alteration in the frequency of hand washing, use of correct fitting PPE and barrier creams are important. Fragrance-free emollients avoid the risk of further sensitization. If avoidance of allergen is not possible, protective measures like clothing, cotton lining latex or vinyl gloves and two-layered gauze-lined masks may be helpful.6, 9 Further, the base of topical medicaments (corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors) to treat the dermatitis should be free from potential allergens. Correct use of PPEs and hand hygiene measures can protect HCWs from acquiring COVID-19 infection. However, iatrogenic problems because of these measures may prevent their proper use, putting HCWs at risk. There is an urgent need to sensitize the larger health fraternity about these issues.1, 4, 6 The patients in this manuscript have given written informed consent to the publication of their case details.

Topics & Concepts

MedicinePandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Coronavirus InfectionsVirologyBetacoronavirusMEDLINEIntensive care medicineOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicineDiseaseLawPolitical scienceDermatology and Skin DiseasesDermatological diseases and infestationsContact Dermatitis and Allergies
Iatrogenic dermatitis in times of COVID‐19: a pandemic within a pandemic | Litcius