Litcius/Paper detail

Environmental Impact of Fused Filament Fabrication: What Is Known from Life Cycle Assessment?

Antonella Sola, Roberto Rosa, Anna María Ferrari

2024Polymers17 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

This systematic review interrogates the literature to understand what is known about the environmental sustainability of fused filament fabrication, FFF (also known as fused deposition modeling, FDM), based on life cycle assessment (LCA) results. Since substantial energy demand is systematically addressed as one of the main reasons for ecological damage in FFF, mitigation strategies are often based on reducing the printing time (for example, adopting thicker layers) or the embodied energy per part (e.g., by nesting, which means by printing multiple parts in the same job). A key parameter is the infill degree, which can be adjusted to the application requirements while saving printing time/energy and feedstock material. The adoption of electricity from renewable resources is also expected to boost the sustainability of distributed manufacturing through FFF. Meanwhile, bio-based and recycled materials are being investigated as less impactful alternatives to conventional fossil fuel-based thermoplastic filaments.

Topics & Concepts

Fused filament fabricationLife-cycle assessmentRaw materialSustainabilityInfillRenewable energyEnvironmental impact assessmentThermoplasticEmbodied energy3D printingFossil fuelElectricityFused deposition modelingProcess engineeringFabricationMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringWaste managementComposite materialCivil engineeringProduction (economics)EcologyElectrical engineeringPathologyEconomicsAlternative medicineMacroeconomicsMedicineBiologyAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesRecycling and Waste Management TechniquesMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Environmental Impact of Fused Filament Fabrication: What Is Known from Life Cycle Assessment? | Litcius