Aberrant inflammatory responses to type I interferon in STAT2 or IRF9 deficiency
Florian Gothe, Jarmila Stremenova Spegarova, Catherine F. Hatton, Helen Griffin, Thomas Sargent, Sally A. Cowley, William James, Anna Roppelt, Anna Shcherbina, Fabian Hauck, Hugh T. Reyburn, C.J. Duncan, Sophie Hambleton
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory phenomena such as hyperinflammation or hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis are a frequent yet paradoxical accompaniment to virus susceptibility in patients with impairment of type I interferon (IFN-I) signaling caused by deficiency of signal transducer and activator of transcription 2 (STAT2) or IFN regulatory factor 9 (IRF9). OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that altered and/or prolonged IFN-I signaling contributes to inflammatory complications in these patients. METHODS: We explored the signaling kinetics and residual transcriptional responses of IFN-stimulated primary cells from individuals with complete loss of one of STAT1, STAT2, or IRF9 as well as gene-edited induced pluripotent stem cell-derived macrophages. RESULTS: Deficiency of any IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 component suppressed but did not abrogate IFN-I receptor signaling, which was abnormally prolonged, in keeping with insufficient induction of negative regulators such as ubiquitin-specific peptidase 18 (USP18). In cells lacking either STAT2 or IRF9, this late transcriptional response to IFN-α2b mimicked the effect of IFN-γ. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest a model wherein the failure of negative feedback of IFN-I signaling in STAT2 and IRF9 deficiency leads to immune dysregulation. Aberrant IFN-α receptor signaling in STAT2- and IRF9-deficient cells switches the transcriptional output to a prolonged, IFN-γ-like response and likely contributes to clinically overt inflammation in these individuals.