Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on liver markers: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trials
Mario Simental‐Mendía, Adriana Sánchez‐García, Luis E. Simental‐Mendía
Abstract
Aim The objective of this meta‐analysis was to evaluate the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy on serum liver function tests. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify randomized placebo‐controlled trials assessing the impact of UDCA on hepatic parameters. Meta‐analysis was conducted using a random‐effects model and sensitivity analysis through the leave‐one‐out method in the Review Manager statistical software version 5.3. Results After UDCA treatment, meta‐analysis revealed a significant reduction of alanine aminotransferase (weighted mean difference [WMD]: –15.28 U/L, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −23.42, −7.15, P = 0.0002, I 2 = 97%), aspartate aminotransferase (WMD: –16.13 U/L, 95% CI: −23.84, −8.42, P < 0.0001, I 2 = 97%), gamma‐glutamyl transferase (WMD: –23.29 U/L, 95% CI: −33.97, −12.61, P < 0.0001, I 2 = 97%), alkaline phosphatase (WMD: –93.80 U/L, 95% CI: −126.36, −61.25, P < 0.0001, I 2 = 95%) and bilirubin (WMD: –0.18 U/L, 95% CI: −0.35, −0.01, P = 0.04, I 2 = 93%), but not significant changes in albumin levels (WMD: 0.10 U/L, 95% CI: −0.05, 0.24, P = 0.18, I 2 = 80%). Conclusion The results of the present meta‐analysis suggest a hepatoprotective effect of UDCA by reducing serum liver parameters.