Adoption of Single-Use Clean Intermittent Catheterization Policies Does Not Appear to Affect Genitourinary Outcomes in a Large Spinal Cord Injury Cohort
Christopher S. Elliott, Kai Dallas, Kazuko Shem, James Crew
Abstract
PURPOSE: In April 2008, Medicare amended its policy for clean intermittent catheterization, increasing coverage from 4 reused catheters per month to up to 200 single-use catheters. The primary reason for the policy change was an assumed decrease in risk of urinary tract infection with single-use catheters. Given its economic/environmental impact (∼50-fold increase in cost and plastic waste) and a paucity of supporting evidence, we retrospectively evaluate the policy's effect in a prospective spinal cord injury registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We accessed data for the years 1995 to 2020 from the National Spinal Cord Injury Database focusing on 1-year follow-up in those unable to volitionally void after injury. We asked 2 questions: (1) Did hospitalizations for genitourinary reasons decrease after the clean intermittent catheterization policy change?; and (2) Did clean intermittent catheterization adoption and adherence increase after the clean intermittent catheterization policy change? RESULTS: = .044). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the 2008 policy change shifting clean intermittent catheterization coverage from catheter reuse to single-use did not decrease hospitalizations for urinary tract infection or increase clean intermittent catheterization uptake in individuals with spinal cord injury.