Brain tumor segmentation using deep learning: high performance with minimized MRI data
Jacky Huang, Banu Yağmurlu, Powell Molleti, Richard Lee, Abigail VanderPloeg, Humaira Noor, Rohan Bareja, Yiheng Li, Michael Iv, Haruka Itakura
Abstract
Purpose Brain tumor segmentation with MRI is a challenging task, traditionally relying on manual delineation of regions-of-interest across multiple imaging sequences. However, this data-intensive approach is time-consuming. We aimed to optimize the process by using a deep learning (DL) based model while minimizing the number of MRI sequences required to segment gliomas. Methods We trained a 3D U-Net DL model using the annotated 2018 MICCAI BraTS dataset (training dataset, n = 285), focusing on sub-segmenting enhancing tumor (ET) and tumor core (TC). We compared the performances of models trained on four different combinations of MRI sequences: T1C-only, FLAIR-only, T1C + FLAIR and T1 + T2 + T1C + FLAIR to evaluate whether a smaller MRI data subset could achieve comparable performance. We evaluated the performance on the four different sequence combinations using 5-fold cross-validation on the training dataset, then on our test dataset ( n = 358) consisting of samples from a separately held-out 2018 BraTS validation set ( n = 66) and 2021 BraTS datasets ( n = 292). Dice scores on both cross-validation and test datasets were assessed to measure model performance. Results Dice scores on cross-validation showed that T1C + FLAIR (ET: 0.814, TC: 0.856) matched or outperformed those of T1 + T2 + T1C + FLAIR (ET: 0.785, TC: 0.841), T1C-only (ET: 0.781, TC: 0.852) and FLAIR-only (ET: 0.008, TC: 0.619). Results on the test dataset also showed that T1C + FLAIR (ET: 0.867, TC: 0.926) matched or outperformed those of T1 + T2 + T1C + FLAIR (ET: 0.835, TC: 0.908), T1C-only (ET: 0.726, TC: 0.928), and FLAIR-only (ET: 0.056, TC: 0.543). T1C + FLAIR excelled in both ET and TC, exceeding the performance of the four-sequence dataset. T1C-only matched T1C + FLAIR in TC performance. Similarly , T1C and T1C + FLAIR also outperformed in ET delineation by sensitivity (0.829) and Hausdorff distance (5.964) on the test set. Across all configurations, specificity remained high (≥0.958). T1C performed well in TC delineation (sensitivity: 0.737), but the inclusion of all sequences led to improvement (0.754). Hausdorff distances clustered in a narrow range (17.622–33.812) for TC delineation across the configurations. Conclusions DL-based brain tumor segmentation can achieve high accuracy using only two MRI sequences (T1C + FLAIR). Reduction of multiple sequence dependency may enhance DL generalizability and dissemination in both clinical and research contexts. Our findings may ultimately help mitigate human labor intensity of a complex task integral to medical imaging analysis.