Tenofovir-diphosphate in peripheral blood mononuclear cells during low, medium and high adherence to emtricitabine/ tenofovir alafenamide vs. emtricitabine/ tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
Jenna Yager, Kristina M. Brooks, José Castillo‐Mancilla, Cricket Nemkov, Mary Morrow, Skyler Peterson, Mustafa E. Ibrahim, Lane R. Bushman, Jennifer J. Kiser, Samantha MaWhinney, Peter L. Anderson
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) preferentially loads peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), resulting in higher PBMC tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). No studies have yet compared TFV-DP in PBMC from lower than daily dosing between prodrugs, which has potential implications for event-driven preexposure prophylaxis and pharmacologic forgiveness. DESIGN: Two separate randomized, directly observed therapy (DOT) crossover studies (DOT-DBS and TAF-DBS) were conducted to mimic low, medium and high adherence. METHODS: HIV-negative adults were randomized to two 12-week DOT regimens of 33, 67 or 100% of daily dosing with emtricitabine (F)/TAF 200 mg/25 mg (TAF-DBS) or F/TDF 200 mg/300 mg (DOT-DBS), separated by a 12-week washout. PBMC steady-state concentrations (Css) of TFV-DP and FTC-TP were estimated using nonlinear mixed models and compared between F/TAF and F/TDF. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants contributed to 33% (n = 23), 67% (n = 23) and 100% (n = 23) of daily F/TAF regimens. Forty-four contributed to 33% (n = 15), 67% (n = 16) and 100% (n = 32) of daily F/TDF regimens. PBMC TFV-DP Css were 7.3 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 6.4-8.2], 7.1 (5.9-8.2) and 6.7- (4.4-8.9) fold higher (P < 0.0001) following F/TAF vs. F/TDF; 593 vs. 81.7, 407 vs. 57.4, and 215 vs. 32.3 fmol/106 cells, respectively. TFV-DP was 2.6 (2.1-3.1) fold higher with 33% F/TAF vs. 100% F/TDF. Estimated half-lives (95% CI) of TFV-DP in PBMC were 2.9 (1.5-5.5) days for F/TAF and 2.1 (1.5-2.9) days for F/TDF. FTC-TP was similar in both studies (P = 0.119). CONCLUSION: F/TAF produced 6.7 to 7.3-fold higher TFV-DP in PBMC vs. F/TDF across adherence levels, supporting increased potency and pharmacologic forgiveness with F/TAF in the PBMC compartment.