Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement,
G. Condous, B. Gerges, Isabelle Thomassin‐Naggara, Christian M. Becker, Carla Tomassetti, Harald Krentel, Bruno J. van Herendael, Mario Malzoni, Maurício Simões Abrão, Ertan Sarıdoğan, J. Keckstein, Gernot Hudelist, Intersociety Consensus Group §, K. Aas‐Eng, Juan Luis Alcázar, Céline Bafort, Marc Bazot, Didier Bielen, Attila Bokor, T. Bourne, Francisco Carmona, A. Di Giovanni, D. Djokovic, Anne Gisselmann Egekvist, J English, C. Exacoustós, Hélder Ferreira, Simone Ferrero, Rosemarie Forstner, Simon Freeman, M. Gonçalves, Grigoris Grimbizis, Adalgisa Guerra, S. Guerriero, F W Jansen, D. Jurkovic, Shaheen Khazali, Mathew Leonardi, Cristina Maciel, Lucia Manganaro, Michael D. Mueller, Michelle Nisolle, Noé G, S. Reid, Horace Roman, Pascal Rousset, Mikkel Seyer Hansen, Sukhbir S. Singh, Viju Thomas, D. Timmerman, U. Ulrich, T. Van den Bosch, Dominique Van Schoubroeck, Arnaud Wattiez
Abstract
The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), ESHRE, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers, and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling, and planning of surgical treatment strategies.