Gold Standard Cholera Diagnostics Are Tarnished by Lytic Bacteriophage and Antibiotics
Eric J. Nelson, Jessica A. Grembi, Dennis L. Chao, Jason R. Andrews, L. А. Alexandrova, P. H. Rodriguez, Vasavi Ramachandran, Md. Abu Sayeed, Joseph Francis Wamala, Amanda K. Debes, David A. Sack, Andrew J. Hryckowian, Farhana Haque, S Khatun, Mohammad Arif Rahman, Allis Chien, Alfred M. Spormann, Gary K. Schoolnik
Abstract
= 78/849), the odds that a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) or qPCR was positive was reduced by 89% (odds ratio [OR], 0.108; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.002 to 0.872) and 87% (OR, 0.130; 95% CI, 0.022 to 0.649), respectively, when lytic bacteriophage were detected. The odds that an RDT or qPCR was positive was reduced by more than 99% (OR, 0.00; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.28) and 89% (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.44), respectively, when azithromycin was detected. Analysis of additional samples from South Sudan found similar phage effects on RDTs; antibiotics were not assayed. Cholera burden estimates may improve by accommodating for the negative effects of lytic bacteriophage and antibiotic exposure on diagnostic positivity. One accommodation is using bacteriophage detection as a proxy for pathogen detection. These findings have relevance for other diagnostic settings where bacterial pathogens are vulnerable to lytic bacteriophage predation.