Ursodeoxycholic acid administration did not reduce susceptibility to <scp>SARS‐CoV</scp>‐2 infection in children
Teng Liu, Jian‐She Wang
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A recent study suggested that administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) at dosages usually employed clinically may reduce rates of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. A recent surge of SARS-CoV-2 omicron infection in China allowed study of whether UDCA administration reduced susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection in children with liver disease. METHODS: Through WeChat groups, a questionnaire was distributed to families (n = 300) in which a child had been admitted to our liver service in the past 5 years. Among the families/households in which someone was infected with SARS-CoV-2, the proportion in which a child taking UDCA was infected was compared with the proportion in which a child not taking UDCA was infected. RESULTS: Of the 300 questionnaire answers, 280 (93.3%) were valid. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed in 226 families (80.7%): 146 children were taking UDCA (10-20 mg/kg/day) and 80 children were not taking UDCA. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed in 95 children taking UDCA (65.1%) and in 51 children not taking UDCA (63.8%) (p = 0.843); SARS-CoV-2 infection was suspected in 23 children taking UDCA (15.8%) and in 11 children not taking UDCA (13.8%) (p = 0.687). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that UDCA administration does not reduce susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection in children with liver disease.