Performance of four commercial real-time PCR assays for the detection of bacterial enteric pathogens in clinical samples
Byron M. Berenger, Linda Chui, Christina Ferrato, Tracie Lloyd, Vincent Li, Dylan R. Pillai
Abstract
ObjectivesMany laboratories use culture-independent diagnostic tests for bacterial gastroenteritis (i.e. real-time polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR) instead of culture because of better sensitivity, automation, and faster turnaround times. To address some gaps in initial evaluations and lack of intraassay comparisons for many commercial RT-PCRs, this study compared the ability of four commercially available RT-PCR tests (Ridagene, Fast Track Diagnostics, BD Max, and Prodesse Progastro) to detect five major bacterial enteric pathogens: Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC), Shigella, and Yersinia.MethodsClinical stool specimens and contrived samples comprising commonly circulating species, serotypes, biovars, and/or toxin subtypes were used for the comparison.ResultsConcordance rates for RT-PCR and culture using culture-positive and culture-negative clinical stools were >90% for Campylobacter (97.5-100%), Salmonella (97.5-100%), Shigella (100%), and STEC (90-100%). However, the agreement between RT-PCR and culture for Y. enteroccolitica ranged from 70-90%. For the contrived sample set, stx2f was detected by one of four assays. Of note, no assay could detect Yersinia non-enterocolitica and Campylobacter upsaliensis.ConclusionsDepending on the prevalence of certain stx sub-types, Yersinia species, and Campylobacter species in a laboratory's jurisdiction, without further improvement in culture-independent tests, culture methods remain critical for the detection of these pathogens.