Embolization of middle meningeal artery for chronic subdural hematoma: Do we have sufficient evidence?
Jai Shankar, Susan E. Alcock, Geneviève Milot
Abstract
Embolization of middle meningeal artery (EMMA) for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is growing in popularity over the last two decade. Several randomized control trials are underway across the world. Indeed, the recent presentation of results from the EMBOLISE (embolization of the middle meningeal artery with onyx liquid embolic system in the treatment of subacute and chronic subdural hematoma), MAGIC-MT (middle meningeal artery treatment) and STEM (squid trial for the embolization of the MMA for the treatment of cSDH) trials at the International Stroke Congress marks a significant development in the field of neurointerventional radiology. The absence of level 1 evidence for EMMA in cSDH underscores the importance of these trials and the need for rigorous evaluation of their results. While the initial findings are promising, further analysis and interpretation are necessary to inform clinical decision-making effectively. We conclude that there may be evidence supporting EMMA for non-surgical cSDH patients, but the evidence for surgical patients is questionable and requires further study. More studies are underway, and hopefully, there will be more evidence on this topic in the coming years.