Litcius/Paper detail

Signal vs Noise in Eye-tracking Data: Biometric Implications and Identity Information Across Frequencies

Mehedi Hasan Raju, Lee Friedman, Dillon Lohr, Oleg V. Komogortsev

202410 citationsDOI

Abstract

Prior research states that frequencies below 75 Hz in eye-tracking data represent the primary eye movement termed “signal” while those above 75 Hz are deemed “noise”. This study examines the biometric significance of this signal-noise distinction and its privacy implications. There are important individual differences in a person’s eye movement, which lead to reliable biometric performance in the “signal” part. Despite minimal eye-movement information in the “noise” recordings, there might be significant individual differences. Our results confirm the “signal” predominantly contains identity-specific information, yet the “noise” also possesses unexpected identity-specific data. This consistency holds for both short-(≈ 20 min) and long-term (≈ 1 year) biometric evaluations. Understanding the location of identity data within the eye movement spectrum is essential for privacy preservation.

Topics & Concepts

BiometricsComputer scienceNoise (video)SIGNAL (programming language)Identity (music)Speech recognitionArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)AcousticsPhysicsImage (mathematics)Programming languageBiometric Identification and SecurityGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyUser Authentication and Security Systems
Signal vs Noise in Eye-tracking Data: Biometric Implications and Identity Information Across Frequencies | Litcius