Hexyl aminolevulinate, 5‐aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion and methyl aminolevulinate in photodynamic therapy of non‐aggressive basal cell carcinomas: A non‐sponsored, randomized, prospective and double‐blinded trial

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the photodynamic therapy (PDT) of non-aggressive basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion (BF-200ALA) has shown non-inferior efficacy when compared with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL), a widely used photosensitizer. Hexyl aminolevulinate (HAL) is an interesting alternative photosensitizer. To our knowledge, this is the first study using HAL-PDT in the treatment of BCCs. OBJECTIVES: To compare the histological clearance, tolerability (pain and post-treatment reaction) and cosmetic outcome of MAL, BF-200 ALA and low-concentration HAL in the PDT of non-aggressive BCCs. METHODS: Ninety-eight histologically verified non-aggressive BCCs met the inclusion criteria, and 54 patients with 95 lesions completed the study. The lesions were randomized to receive LED-PDT in two repeated treatments with MAL, BF-200 ALA or HAL. Efficacy was assessed both clinically and confirmed histologically at three months by blinded observers. Furthermore, cosmetic outcome, pain, post-treatment reactions fluorescence and photobleaching were evaluated. RESULTS: According to intention-to-treat analyses, the histologically confirmed lesion clearance was 93.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 79.9-98.3) for MAL, 90.9% (95% CI = 76.4-96.9) for BF-200 ALA and 87.9% (95% CI = 72.7-95.2) for HAL, with no differences between the arms (P = 0.84). There were no differences between the arms as regards pain, post-treatment reactions or cosmetic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy with low-concentration HAL and BF-200 ALA has a similar efficacy, tolerability and cosmetic outcome compared to MAL. HAL is an interesting new option in dermatological PDT, since good efficacy is achieved with a low concentration.

Topics & Concepts