Litcius/Paper detail

Conceptualizing the Transnational Regulation of Plastics: Moving Towards a Preventative and Just Agenda for Plastics

Hope Johnson, Zoe Nay, Rowena Maguire, Leonie Barner, Alice Payne, Manuela Taboada

2021Transnational Environmental Law17 citationsDOI

Abstract

Abstract This article categorizes and evaluates how regulatory regimes conceptualize plastics, and how such conceptualizations affect the production, consumption, and disposal of plastics. Taking a doctrinal and policy-oriented approach, it identifies four ‘frames’ – that is, four distinct and coherent sets of meanings attributed to plastics within transnational regulation – namely, plastics as waste to be managed; a material to be prevented; a good (or waste) to be traded freely; and inputs or outputs in production-consumption systems. Based on this analysis, three significant deficiencies in the transnational regulation of plastics are identified: the failure to frame plastics in terms of environmental justice and human rights issues; insufficient focus on plastics prevention (rather than management); and the role of law in reinforcing its production and consumption.

Topics & Concepts

Consumption (sociology)Production (economics)Frame (networking)BusinessRegulatory focus theoryEconomic JusticeLaw and economicsPolitical scienceLawEngineeringSociologyEconomicsSocial scienceTelecommunicationsCreativityMacroeconomicsMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionRecycling and Waste Management TechniquesEnvironmental Justice and Health Disparities