Litcius/Paper detail

Clinical Animal Behaviour: Paradigms, Problems and Practice

Daniel S. Mills

2022Animals23 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Both the public and clinicians are interested in the application of scientific knowledge concerning problem animal behaviour and its treatment. However, in order to do this effectively it is essential that individuals have not only scientific literacy but also an appreciation of philosophical concepts underpinning a particular approach and their practical implications on the knowledge generated as a result. This paper highlights several common misunderstandings and biases associated with different scientific perspectives relevant to clinical animal behaviour and their consequences for how we determine what may be a useful treatment for a given patient. In addition to more reflective evaluation of results, there is a need for researchers to report more information of value to clinicians; such as relevant treatment outcomes, effect sizes, population characteristics. Clinicians must also appreciate the limitations of population level study results to a given case. These challenges can however be overcome with the careful critical reflection using the scientific principles and caveats described.

Topics & Concepts

UnderpinningValue (mathematics)Reflection (computer programming)PsychologyEngineering ethicsScientific evidencePopulationSociology of scientific knowledgeScientific literacyManagement scienceMedicineEpistemologyComputer scienceAlternative medicineSociologySocial sciencePathologyEngineeringMachine learningProgramming languagePhilosophyEnvironmental healthCivil engineeringAnimal testing and alternativesBehavioral and Psychological StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Clinical Animal Behaviour: Paradigms, Problems and Practice | Litcius