Litcius/Paper detail

Randomised comparison of two household survey modules for measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in five countries: the Every Newborn-INDEPTH study

Joseph Akuze, Hannah Blencowe, Peter Waiswa, Angela Baschieri, Vladimir Sergeevich Gordeev, Doris Kwesiga, Ane Bærent Fisker, Sanne Marie Thysen, Amabélia Rodrigues, Gashaw Andargie Biks, Solomon Mokonnen Abebe, Kassahun Alemu Gelaye, Mezgebu Yitayal, Bisrat Misganaw Geremew, Tadesse Guadu Delele, Adane Kebede Tesega, Temesgen Azemeraw Yitayew, Simon Kasasa, Edward Galiwango, Davis Natukwatsa, Dan Kajungu, Yeetey Enuameh, Obed Ernest A. Nettey, Francis Dzabeng, Seeba Amenga‐Etego, Sam Newton, Charlotte Tawiah, Kwaku Poku Asante, Seth Owusu‐Agyei, Nurul Alam, M Moinuddin Haider, Ali Imam, Kaiser Mahmud, Simon Cousens, Joy E Lawn, Tadesse Awoke Ayele, Telake Bisetegn Bisetegn, Nafisa Delwar, Lemma Derseh Gezie, Collins Gyezaho, Judith Kaija, Kazuyo Machiyama, Grace Manu, Alexander Manu, Justiniano SD Martins, Tesfahun Melese, Sayed S Alam, Tryphena Nareeba, Victoria Ponce Hardy, Charles Zandoh, Fred Arnold, Peter Byass, Trevor Croft, Kobus Herbst, Sunita Kishor, Florina Serbanescu

2020The Lancet Global Health122 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An estimated 5·1 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually. Household surveys, most notably the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), run in more than 90 countries and are the main data source from the highest burden regions, but data-quality concerns remain. We aimed to compare two questionnaires: a full birth history module with additional questions on pregnancy losses (FBH+; the current DHS standard) and a full pregnancy history module (FPH), which collects information on all livebirths, stillbirths, miscarriages, and neonatal deaths. METHODS: Women residing in five Health and Demographic Surveillance System sites within the INDEPTH Network (Bandim in Guinea-Bissau, Dabat in Ethiopia, IgangaMayuge in Uganda, Matlab in Bangladesh, and Kintampo in Ghana) were randomly assigned (individually) to be interviewed using either FBH+ or FPH between July 28, 2017, and Aug 13, 2018. The primary outcomes were stillbirths and neonatal deaths in the 5 years before the survey interview (measured by stillbirth rate [SBR] and neonatal mortality rate [NMR]) and mean time taken to complete the maternity history section of the questionnaire. We also assessed between-site heterogeneity. This study is registered with the Research Registry, 4720. FINDINGS: =0·7%; p=0·40). INTERPRETATION: FPH takes an average of 1·4 min longer to complete than does FBH+, but has the potential to increase reporting of stillbirths in high burden contexts. The between-site heterogeneity we found might reflect variations in interviewer training and survey implementation, emphasising the importance of interviewer skills, training, and consistent implementation in data quality. FUNDING: Children's Investment Fund Foundation.

Topics & Concepts

MedicinePediatricsEnvironmental healthGlobal Maternal and Child HealthSurvey Methodology and NonresponseMobile Health and mHealth Applications