Litcius/Paper detail

Exploring Stakeholders’ Interpretations of Safe Sport

Joseph Gurgis, Gretchen Kerr, Anthony Battaglia

2022Journal of Sport and Social Issues29 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

In response to numerous highly publicized cases of athlete maltreatment, sport organizations have developed prevention and intervention strategies under the umbrella term of Safe Sport; however, confusion exists about what it does and does not encompass. To better understand what Safe Sport encompasses, this study sought to develop a conceptual framework of Safe Sport, informed by the perspectives of various stakeholders in sport. Using a social constructivist grounded theory approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with forty-one participants, including athletes, coaches, sport administrators, and researchers. The results are interpreted to suggest that participants’ understanding of Safe Sport are informed by three overarching themes: environmental and physical safety, relational safety, and optimising sport, all of which are viewed as continuously evolving relative to the ever-changing context of sport and broader society. Recommendations are made to optimise sport experiences and thus prevent physical and psychological harms through a safeguarding approach that prioritizes the promotion of human rights.

Topics & Concepts

SafeguardingAthletesSport psychologyPsychologyGrounded theoryContext (archaeology)Public relationsSport managementConceptual frameworkApplied psychologyEngineering ethicsSocial psychologyQualitative researchSociologyPolitical scienceEngineeringMedicineSocial sciencePhysical therapyNursingBiologyPaleontologySports injuries and preventionSport Psychology and PerformanceCardiovascular Effects of Exercise