Bone Mineral Densitometry Reporting: Pearls and Pitfalls
Patrick Martineau, Sarah Morgan, William D. Leslie
Abstract
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the method of choice for assessing bone mineral density (BMD). Unfortunately, the performance and interpretation of DXA can be challenging and errors are common. In fact, it has been reported that up to 90% of BMD reports contain at least 1 error. Errors can be the result of technique or interpretative in nature or both and can result in inappropriate diagnosis and management. In this article, we review the various types of pitfalls frequently encountered by physicians interpreting DXA studies. Being aware of these pitfalls will help readers recognize and avoid them when encountered in clinical practice.
Topics & Concepts
MedicineBone mineralDensitometryDual energyDual-energy X-ray absorptiometryClinical PracticeMedical physicsInterpretation (philosophy)RadiologyOsteoporosisPhysical therapyPathologyInternal medicineComputer scienceProgramming languageBone health and osteoporosis researchBody Composition Measurement TechniquesMeta-analysis and systematic reviews