Litcius/Paper detail

Clinical Significance of Low-Flow Time in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Results from the RESCUE Registry

Ik Hyun Park, Jeong Hoon Yang, Woo Jin Jang, Woo Jung Chun, Ju Hyeon Oh, Yong Hwan Park, Cheol Woong Yu, Hyun‐Joong Kim, Bum Sung Kim, Jin‐Ok Jeong, Hyun‐Jong Lee, Hyeon‐Cheol Gwon

2020Journal of Clinical Medicine16 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Limited data are available on the association between low-flow time and survival in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) who undergo extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). We evaluated data from 183 IHCA patients who underwent ECPR as a rescue procedure. Patients were divided into two groups: patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as an adjunct to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for less than 38 min (n = 110) or for longer than 38 min (n = 73). The ECPR ≤ 38 min group had a significantly greater incidence of survival to discharge compared to the ECPR > 38 min group (40.0% versus 24.7%, p = 0.032). The incidence of good neurologic outcomes at discharge tended to be greater in the ECPR ≤ 38 min group than in the ECPR > 38 min group (35.5% versus 24.7%, p = 0.102). The incidences of limb ischemia (p = 0.354) and stroke (p = 0.805) were similar between the two groups, but major bleeding occurred less frequently in the ECPR ≤ 38 min group compared to the ECPR > 38 min group (p = 0.002). Low-flow time ≤ 38 min may reduce the risk of mortality and fatal neurologic damage and could be a measure of optimal management in patients with IHCA.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitationExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationCardiopulmonary resuscitationIncidence (geometry)ResuscitationCardiopulmonary bypassRescue therapyAnesthesiaExtracorporealInternal medicineCardiologyOpticsPhysicsCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair