Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in evaluation of inflammation in non-dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD)
Peiyuan Li, Chenqi Xia, Peng Liu, Zhong Peng, Hong Huang, Juan Wu, Zhangxiu He
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been reported to be associated with inflammation in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving dialysis. However, the value of NLR and PLR in non-dialysis patients with ESRD remains unclear. METHODS: Among 611 non-dialysis patients with ESRD in The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China (2012-2018), we compared NLR and PLR in patients with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels of ≤3 mg/L vs. > 3 mg/L. Correlation of NLR and PLR to hs-CRP, PCT, ferritin were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used for estimating sensitivity and specificity of NLR and PLR. RESULTS: NLR was higher in the patients with high hs-CRP levels (> 3 mg/L), compared to patients with low hs-CRP levels (≤ 3 mg/L) [5.74 (3.54-9.01) vs. 3.96 (2.86-5.85), p < 0.0001]. Additionally, PLR was higher in high hs-CRP group than in low group [175.28 (116.67-252.26) vs. 140.65 (110.51-235.17), p = 0.022]. In the current study, NLR and PLR were both positively correlated with hs-CRP (rs = 0.377, p = 0.000 for NLR; rs = 0.161, p = 0.001 for PLR), PCT, leukocytes, neutrophils, platelets, and age. NLR or PLR with a cut-off value of 5.07 or 163.80 indicated sensitivity and specificity were 65.67 and 66.37% (AUC = 0.69) or 57.21 and 57.52% (AUC = 0.55), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NLR or PLR was positively correlated with hs-CRP in non-dialysis patients with ESRD. NLR might be better for identifying inflammation than PLR in this population.