Sarcopenia Is a Prognostic Factor of Adverse Effects and Mortality in Patients With Tumour: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Yujie Zhang, Jingjing Zhang, Yunfan Zhan, Zhe Pan, Qiaohong Liu, Wei-An Yuan
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between sarcopenia and the prognosis of patients with tumours who received radio- and/or chemotherapy still needs to be determined. In this study, we aim to investigate the relationship between sarcopenia and adverse effects and mortality in patients with tumours that received radio- and/or chemotherapy, stratified by study design, tumour category, the method sarcopenia assessed, treatment options, study location and among other factors. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were searched from inception to 15 August 2024, without language restrictions and with a manual search of references for additional articles retrieval. Cohort studies of ≥ 100 patients with tumours that evaluated the association between sarcopenia or muscle mass and the adverse effects or overall survival induced by radio- and/or chemotherapy were included. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies were included, involving 8966 patients with tumours, including 3383 patients with sarcopenia. The pooled prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with tumours was 0.42 (95% CI 0.36-0.48, p < 0.001) overall. The prevalence of sarcopenia is higher in Oceania patients 0.60 (95% CI 0.28-0.89, p < 0.001), those with reproductive tumour 0.57 (95% CI 0.30-0.83, p < 0.001), and sarcopenia assessed by the lumbar-skeletal muscle index 0.46 (95% CI 0.39-0.53, p < 0.001) than in other subgroups, but not show significant differences in sex. Sarcopenia was associated with an increased risk of adverse effects in patients who received radio- and/or chemotherapy, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.44 (95% CI 1.21-1.71, p < 0.001). Retrospective studies (RR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.24-1.79; p < 0.001), sarcopenia assessed by other methods (RR = 2.98; 95% CI 1.52-5.87; p < 0.001), and patients in Europe (RR = 1.92; 95% CI 1.15-3.22; p = 0.013), received chemoradiotherapy (RR = 1.47; 95% CI 1.23-1.76; p < 0.001), and with head and neck tumours (RR = 1.54; 95% CI 1.17-2.01; p = 0.010) had higher relative risk than other subgroups. Sarcopenia was also associated with reduced overall survival in patients with tumours, with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 1.66 (95% CI 1.40-1.96, p < 0.001). Prospective studies (HR = 1.72; 95% CI 0.97-3.07; p = 0.065), sarcopenia assessed by the cervical-skeletal muscle index (HR = 2.66; 95% CI 1.73-4.09; p < 0.001), and patients in Asia (HR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.50-2.42; p < 0.001), received chemoradiotherapy (HR = 1.85; 95% CI 1.46-2.45; p < 0.001) and with head and neck tumours (HR = 2.35; 95% CI 1.88-2.95; p < 0.001) had higher HR than other subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia was associated with a higher risk of adverse effects and mortality in patients with tumours received radio- and/or chemotherapy.