Detection of antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 in patients with COVID‐19
Zhe Du, Fengxue Zhu, Fuzheng Guo, Bo Yang, Tianbing Wang
Abstract
Testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA has become the standard for COVID-19 diagnosis.1, 2 However, a number of false negative results have been reported,2 resulting in a failure to quarantine infected patients. If unchecked, this could cause a major setback in containing viral transmission.3 Titers of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies can reflect the progress of viral infection. Around 60 convalescent patients (with an onset time of 6-7 weeks) in a ward in the Wuhan Tongji Hospital were tested for specific antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. All patients tested positive for the IgG against the virus, while 13 patients tested negative for immunoglobulin M (IgM), with the immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer being greater than the IgM titer (Table 1 and Figure 1). Meanwhile, the IgM and IgG titers in 10 convalescent patients were tested twice (1 week apart); both titers showed a decrease, with the IgG titer being greater than the IgM titer (Table 2 and Figure 1). In these patients, two consecutive SARS-CoV-2 RNA tests were negative and the chest computed tomography findings indicated improvement. Considering this, their antibody titers and consistent clinical manifestations suggested that antibody detection could act as an indicator of the stage of COVID-19 progression and that the antibodies in convalescent patients are not always maintained at a high level. The immune status fitted both, the clinical and general characteristics of the humoral response. In one report, while 38 patients in the acute phase of the infection tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 31 (81.6%) of them tested negative for IgM and IgG in serological assays,4 thereby demonstrating that these patients were in the early stages of infection, as both the antibody titers were relatively low (Supplemental table 1). COVID-19 patients will develop immunity after recovery; however, the persistence, attenuation, and duration of protection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies requires further investigation.5 Presently, data regarding the COVID-19 spectrum are mainly focused on clinical infection with respiratory symptoms. The proportion of subclinical infections and atypical patients remains unknown. Antibody detection will help in the profiling of the COVID-19 spectrum. Epidemiological surveys of serum antibody levels in the population would help in fully understanding how many people have ever been infected. This information will allow the determination of the proportion of different types of infected individuals and a profiling of the complete disease spectrum of COVID-19. High virus volumes and transmission have been reported in the asymptomatic phase.6 By combining the results of RNA and antibody testing, we can further identify the contribution of different types of infected people (especially the atypical ones and those with subclinical infection) in the spread of the virus and the disease. This will provide a key scientific basis for the discovery and management of infectious sources. Detection of IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2 is a fast and simple screening method. As an effective supplement to RNA testing, antibody detection is of epidemiological significance and is an important means to understand the occurrence, development, prognosis, and outcome of COVID-19. More medical research on the expression levels of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and on the prognosis of COVID-19 is required. This work was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7204321). We thank Dr. Bo Yang for collecting and providing serological data. The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests. ZD and FZG drafted the manuscript. FXZ, BY, and TBW cared for the patients and collected the data. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.