Litcius/Paper detail

<i>Escherichia coli</i> Cytoplasmic Expression of Disulfide-Bonded Proteins: Side-by-Side Comparison between Two Competing Strategies

Angel Castillo-Corujo, Yuko Uchida, Mirva J. Saaranen, Lloyd W. Ruddock

2024Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology12 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

CyDisCo. However, to our knowledge, the relative effectiveness of these strategies has not been properly evaluated. Here, we systematically compare the purified yields of 14 different proteins of interest (POI) that contain disulfide bonds in their native state when expressed in both systems. We also compared the effects of different background strains, commonly used promoters, and two media types: defined and rich autoinduction. In rich autoinduction media, POI which can be produced in a soluble (non-native) state without a system for disulfide bond formation were produced in higher purified yields from SHuffle, whereas all other proteins were produced in higher purified yields using CyDisCo. In chemically defined media, purified yields were at least 10x higher in all cases using CyDisCo. In addition, the quality of the three POI tested was superior when produced using CyDisCo.

Topics & Concepts

Periplasmic spaceEscherichia coliCytoplasmDisulfide bondRecombinant DNAInclusion bodiesBiochemistryChemistryProtein disulfide-isomeraseGeneEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyCellular transport and secretion
<i>Escherichia coli</i> Cytoplasmic Expression of Disulfide-Bonded Proteins: Side-by-Side Comparison between Two Competing Strategies | Litcius