Litcius/Paper detail

Comparative Efficacy of e‐Health Interventions for Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Liyang Duan, Shu Zhang, Qianwen Yan, Yang Chen, Yawen Su, Xiaolin Hu

2026Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing8 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In clinical oncology nursing practice, the preservation of quality of life is an essential component. E-health interventions have been proven effective in improving quality of life in patients with cancer, but the optimal content and delivery format remain undetermined. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of e-health interventions with varying contents and delivery formats in improving quality of life in patients with cancer. DESIGN: Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. DATA SOURCE: Six databases, including Medline, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO, were searched from inception to October 25, 2025. METHODS: Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. A pairwise meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis were performed sequentially to determine the efficacy of different contents and delivery formats of e-health interventions in improving quality of life in patients with cancer. RESULTS: A total of 50 studies included e-health interventions with eight contents and five delivery formats. The results identified health education (SUCRA = 82.2%), symptom management (SUCRA = 72.2%), and rehabilitation interventions (SUCRA = 71.1%) as the three most effective e-health intervention contents for improving quality of life in patients with cancer. Among delivery formats, app-based (SUCRA = 82.1%), internet/web-based (SUCRA = 71.5%), and telephone-based e-health interventions (SUCRA = 53.3%) ranked among the top three. CONCLUSIONS: This study explored the efficacy of different contents and delivery formats of e-health interventions in improving quality of life in patients with cancer. These results are expected to provide an evidence-based basis for clinical oncology nursing practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO number: CRD42025638829.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineRandomized controlled trialQuality of life (healthcare)Psychological interventionPhysical therapyIntervention (counseling)Intensive care medicineQuality (philosophy)Clinical trialMEDLINEHealth related quality of lifeRandomizationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCancer survivorship and careEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerDigital Mental Health Interventions
Comparative Efficacy of e‐Health Interventions for Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials | Litcius