Litcius/Paper detail

Biological methane potentials of food waste of different components: Methane yields, production kinetics, and element balance

Justin A Donatelli, Sheng Chang

2024Bioresource Technology18 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

• FW components exert significant impact on FW methane yield. • HPLFW feeds showed significantly higher CH 4 yield than HCFW feeds. • FW CH 4 production can be described by a modified two-component kinetic model. • Element formula of organic content of FW were determined. This study assessed the methane production from food waste (FW) with dominant components of Meat (MFW), Fruit &Veg (VFW), Grain (GFW), Dairy (DFW), and the mixed feed of these components (MixFW). The high protein and lipid content FW (HPLFW) of MFW, DFW, and MixFW showed the methane yields of 337.0 ± 3.0, 307.4 ± 0.8, and 297.1 ± 1.2 ml-CH 4 /gCOD, respectively, while those for the high carbohydrate content FW (HCFW) of VFW and GFW were 238.3 ± 1.2 and 171.2 ± 0.3 ml-CH 4 /gCOD, respectively. A modified two-component kinetic (MTK) model was demonstrated to be the best to describe the methane production kinetics of both HPLFW and HCFW types of feeds. The element balance analysis revealed the element formula of the FW feeds and the methane-conversion organic content. The results obtained from this study showed that the high lipid and animal protein content increased the methane yield and biogas methane composition.

Topics & Concepts

MethaneFood wasteChemistryMaterial balanceEnvironmental scienceFood scienceWaste managementEnvironmental chemistryOrganic chemistryEngineeringProcess engineeringAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactFood Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production