Litcius/Paper detail

The age of LARC: making sexual citizens on the frontiers of technoscientific healthism

Jenny Dyck Brian, Patrick R. Grzanka, Emily S. Mann

2020Health Sociology Review20 citationsDOI

Abstract

Routinely positioned as the ‘first-line option’ for contraceptive choice-making, long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) promotion efforts have come under critical scrutiny by reproductive justice advocates for the extent to which public health actors’ preference for LARC devices may override potential users’ ability to freely (not) choose to use contraception among an array of options. We identify LARC promotion discourse as constituting ‘The Age of LARC’: multifarious strategies for producing responsible sexual citizens whose health behaviours are empowered via a LARC-only approach to contraceptive use. We suggest that immediate postpartum LARC insertion policies, which have proliferated in the U.S. since 2012, exemplify the new era of LARC hegemony, in which urgency, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and outcomes dominate both health policy and clinical practice around these contraceptive technologies. By following these efforts to facilitate access to and use of immediate postpartum LARC, we find a discourse on sexual citizenship that paradoxically constructs sexual health freedom through the use of a single class of contraceptive technologies.

Topics & Concepts

Long-acting reversible contraceptionReproductive healthScrutinyCitizenshipReproductive rightsGender studiesFamily planningMedicineReproductive justiceSociologyPopulationPolitical scienceLawEnvironmental healthGeneticsPoliticsPregnancyAbortionBiologyResearch methodologyReproductive Health and ContraceptionReproductive Health and TechnologiesAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health