Evaluation of real‐world effectiveness of perampanel in Japanese adults and older adults with epilepsy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While previous studies have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of perampanel (PER) in combination with other anti-seizure medications in adult patients, data for older patients are limited. This study aimed to confirm real-world safety and effectiveness of combination treatment with PER in Japanese patients with focal seizures with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) or generalised tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) according to age subgroups (<65 and ≥65 years of age). METHODS: This large-sample prospective post-marketing observational study included a 24-52-week observation period after the first PER treatment. Safety was assessed according to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and efficacy was evaluated based on the 50% responder rate and rates of overall symptom improvement. RESULTS: Among the 3,808 patients who were enrolled, 3,716 (3,026 patients aged <65 years and 690 patients aged ≥65 years) and 3,272 were included in the safety and efficacy analysis datasets, respectively. ADRs were reported for 1,247 patients (33.6%) in the safety analysis dataset. Of these, 36.2% and 22.2% were aged <65 years and ≥65 years, respectively, and the most common ADRs were somnolence (11.6%, 5.5%) and dizziness (9.7%, 5.4%). The 50% responder rates in patients aged <65 years and those ≥65 years were 60.1% and 89.0% for those with focal aware seizures (FAS) with motor signs; 48.0% and 60.0% for FAS without motor signs; 47.4% and 80.2% for focal impaired awareness seizures; 70.8% and 93.4% for FBTCS; and 63.6% and 88.9% for GTCS, respectively. The improvement rates of symptoms/conditions were also higher in patients aged ≥65 years than those <65 years. SIGNIFICANCE: PER was effective in reducing seizure frequency and was safe, especially in older patients. PER may be a clinical treatment option for older patients with seizure disorders.

Topics & Concepts