Litcius/Paper detail

Human and Animal Well‐Being

Donald W. Bruckner

2021Pacific philosophical quarterly22 citationsDOI

Abstract

Abstract There is almost no theoretical discussion of non‐human animal well‐being in the philosophical literature on well‐being. To begin to rectify this, I develop a desire satisfaction theory of well‐being for animals. I contrast this theory with my desire theory of well‐being for humans, according to which a human benefits from satisfying desires for which she can offer reasons. I consider objections. The most important are (1) Eden Lin's claim that the correct theory of well‐being cannot vary across different welfare subjects and (2) his objection against theories of human well‐being that require exercising a sophisticated capacity such as reason giving.

Topics & Concepts

Human beingWell-beingEpistemologyHuman welfareContrast (vision)SociologyPhilosophyPsychologyWelfareHumanityComputer scienceLawPolitical scienceArtificial intelligencePsychotherapistTheologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies