Litcius/Paper detail

Lipoprotein(a) and PCSK9 inhibition: clinical evidence

Massimiliano Ruscica, Maria Francesca Greco, Nicola Ferri, Alberto Corsini

2020European Heart Journal Supplements33 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Compelling evidence has emerged from epidemiological and Mendelian randomization analyses relative to the causality of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD), being elevated Lp(a) a strong risk factor regardless of the reduction of LDL-C achieved by statins. So far, no specific available agent can lower Lp(a) to the extent required to achieve a cardiovascular (CV) benefit, i.e. approximately 100 mg/dL. The most recent outcomes trial FOURIER with evolocumab showed that a 25 nmol/L (12 mg/dL) reduction in Lp(a) corresponded to a 15% decrement in the relative risk of cardiovascular disease. The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial with alirocumab has been the first demonstrating that a reduction in Lp(a) associates with less major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), i.e. hazard ratio: 0.994 per 1 mg/dL decrement in Lp(a). The Lp(a) lowering effect driven by PCSK9 inhibition was confirmed in carriers of PCSK9 loss-of-function mutations in which Lp(a) and oxPL-apoB levels were decreased compared to non-carriers as was for a slight larger number of apo(a) Kringle IV repeats. Although PCSK9 inhibitors are not able to decrease Lp(a) to the extent required to achieve a CV benefit, their use has led to a higher discontinuation rate in lipoprotein apheresis in patients with progressive ASCVD and high plasma Lp(a).

Topics & Concepts

Lipoprotein(a)MedicinePCSK9Mendelian randomizationInternal medicineEvolocumabAlirocumabApolipoprotein BLipoproteinHazard ratioRosuvastatinEndocrinologyRisk factorMaceCardiologyCholesterolLDL receptorMyocardial infarctionConfidence intervalApolipoprotein A1GenotypeBiochemistryConventional PCIGenetic variantsChemistryGeneLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Lipoprotein(a) and PCSK9 inhibition: clinical evidence | Litcius