Prospective Comparison of<sup>68</sup>Ga-NeoB and<sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
Heying Duan, Hong Song, Guido Davidzon, Farshad Moradi, Tie Liang, Andreas M. Loening, Shreyas Vasanawala, Andrei Iagaru
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and gastrin-releasing peptide receptors are both overexpressed in prostate cancer (PC) but may provide complementary information.<sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-R2 and <sup>68</sup>Ga-NeoB (DOTA-<i>p</i>-aminomethylaniline-diglycolic acid-DPhe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-NH-CH[CH<sub>2</sub>-CH(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]<sub>2</sub>) are novel PET radiopharmaceuticals that were developed for theranostic use. In this phase II imaging study, we assessed the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic performance of <sup>68</sup>Ga-NeoB and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI for detection of biochemically recurrent PC. <b>Methods:</b> We prospectively enrolled 27 men with suspected biochemically recurrent PC after initial treatment but noncontributory conventional imaging results (negative or equivocal findings on MRI, CT, and/or bone scan). Participants underwent <sup>68</sup>Ga-NeoB and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI within 2 wk in noncontrolled order. The SUV<sub>max</sub> of putative PC lesions was measured and compared with a composite reference standard (histopathology, follow-up imaging, prostate-specific antigen change). The SUV<sub>max</sub> and SUV<sub>mean</sub> of background organs were measured. Vital signs were recorded before injection of the radiopharmaceuticals and after the scans. Adverse events were recorded up to 72 h after each scan. <b>Results:</b> The prostate-specific antigen level at enrollment was 3.5 ± 3.9 ng/mL (range, 0.3–13.5 ng/mL). <sup>68</sup>Ga-NeoB PET/MRI detected 31 lesions in 18 patients (66.7%), whereas <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-R2 identified 20 lesions in 15 participants (55.6%). <sup>68</sup>Ga-NeoB PET/MRI showed higher sensitivity (85.7% vs. 71.4%), accuracy (88.9% vs. 77.8%), and negative predictive value (66.7% vs. 50.0%) than <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-R2, whereas specificity and positive predictive value were equally high (100.0% for both). In 6 patients, <sup>68</sup>Ga-NeoB PET/MRI identified 14 lesions that were false-negative on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI. The mean lesion SUV<sub>max</sub> was 6.6 ± 3.2 (range, 2.9–13.2) for <sup>68</sup>Ga-NeoB and 4.4 ± 1.5 (range, 2.6–8.8) for <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-R2 (<i>P</i> = 0.019). Overall lower uptake was noted in tumors and background organs for <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-R2. There were no significant changes in vital signs before and after the scans. No adverse events were reported in the 72-h period after scans. <b>Conclusion:</b><sup>68</sup>Ga-NeoB and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-R2 are safe for diagnostic imaging. <sup>68</sup>Ga-NeoB PET/MRI showed better diagnostic performance than <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-R2. <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-R2 showed overall lower uptake, equally in background organs and tumors, and might therefore not be an ideal theranostic compound. Further evaluation in larger cohorts is needed to confirm our preliminary data.