Litcius/Paper detail

Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective

Gregory N. Bratman, Christopher B. Anderson, Marc G. Berman, B.J. Cochran, S. de Vries, Jon Flanders, Carl Folke, Howard Frumkin, James J. Gross, Terry Hartig, Peter H. Kahn, Ming Kuo, Joshua J. Lawler, Phillip S. Levin, Therese Lindahl, Andreas Meyer‐Lindenberg, Richard Mitchell, Zhiyun Ouyang, Jenny Roe, Lynn Scarlett, Jeffrey R. Smith, Matilda van den Bosch, Benedict W. Wheeler, Mathew P. White, Hua Zheng, Gretchen C. Daily

2019Science Advances1,891 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

A growing body of empirical evidence is revealing the value of nature experience for mental health. With rapid urbanization and declines in human contact with nature globally, crucial decisions must be made about how to preserve and enhance opportunities for nature experience. Here, we first provide points of consensus across the natural, social, and health sciences on the impacts of nature experience on cognitive functioning, emotional well-being, and other dimensions of mental health. We then show how ecosystem service assessments can be expanded to include mental health, and provide a heuristic, conceptual model for doing so.

Topics & Concepts

Mental healthEcosystem servicesPerspective (graphical)UrbanizationEmpirical evidencePsychologyValue (mathematics)Ecosystem healthCognitionNatural (archaeology)Environmental resource managementEcosystemEcologyGeographyComputer scienceEnvironmental sciencePsychiatryBiologyEpistemologyMachine learningArchaeologyPhilosophyArtificial intelligenceUrban Green Space and HealthLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesUrban Agriculture and Sustainability
Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective | Litcius