Litcius/Paper detail

The Japanese Epidemiologic Study for Perioperative Anaphylaxis, a prospective nationwide study: clinical signs, severity, and therapeutic agents

Yuki Sugiyama, Tomonori Takazawa, Natsuko Watanabe, Kiyoko Bito, Tetsuhiro Fujiyoshi, Shinsuke Hamaguchi, Takashi Haraguchi, Tatsuo Horiuchi, Yoshinori Kamiya, Noboru Maruyama, Hitoshi Masumo, Harumasa Nakazawa, Kazuhiro Nagumo, Masaki Orihara, Jun Sato, Kenichi Sekimoto, Kenichiro Takahashi, Mutsumi Uchiyama, K Takahashi, Masao Yamaguchi, Mikito Kawamata

2023British Journal of Anaesthesia18 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of perioperative anaphylaxis is difficult because of its non-specific and variable signs and symptoms. Therapeutic agents used to treat anaphylaxis and anaesthesiologist responses also vary depending on the case, which might affect outcomes; however, only a few studies have focused on these factors. METHODS: This prospective study of perioperative anaphylaxis, a part of the Japanese Epidemiologic Study for Perioperative Anaphylaxis, investigated the clinical signs, its severity, therapeutic drugs, epinephrine administration, and anaesthesiologist responses in cases of perioperative anaphylaxis to assess trends and variability. Shock index was used to assess severity of cardiovascular collapse. RESULTS: In 43 patients analysed in this study, cardiovascular signs (88.4%) were the most frequent, followed by skin (81.4%) and respiratory signs (60.5%). The presence of signs increased during the clinical course. The median time from the first signs to diagnosis of anaphylaxis was 10 (5.0-17.8) min. The rates of epinephrine use were 30.2% (unused), 48.8% (i.v.), and 20.9% (i.m.). The median time from diagnosis of anaphylaxis to epinephrine administration was 7 (inter-quartile range: 1.5-8.0) min. Antihistamines and corticosteroids were each used in 69.8% of cases. The worst shock index was higher in patients who received i.v. epinephrine (2.77 [0.90] mean [standard deviation]) than in both no epinephrine use cases (1.35 [0.41]) and i.m. epinephrine cases (1.89 [0.77] (P<0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical signs and treatments of perioperative anaphylaxis are variable, and the choice regarding epinephrine administration is based on symptom severity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000035350.

Topics & Concepts

AnaphylaxisMedicineEpinephrinePerioperativeAnesthesiaVital signsProspective cohort studyQuartileShock (circulatory)AllergyInternal medicineConfidence intervalImmunologyFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchNausea and vomiting managementDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions