Litcius/Paper detail

Comparison of MIC Test Strip and Sensititre YeastOne with the CLSI and EUCAST Broth Microdilution Reference Methods for <i>In Vitro</i> Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Cryptococcus neoformans

Fatima Zohra Delma, Abdullah M. S. Al‐Hatmi, Jochem B. Buil, Hein van der Lee, Marlou Tehupeiory-Kooreman, Sybren de Hoog, Joseph Meletiadis, Paul E. Verweij

2020Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy21 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

We compared MIC test strip (MTS) and Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) methods with EUCAST and CLSI methods for amphotericin B, 5-fluocytosine, fluconazole, voriconazole, and isavuconazole against 106 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. The overall essential agreement between the EUCAST and CLSI methods was &gt;72% and &gt;94% at ±1 and ±2 dilutions, respectively. The essential agreements between SYO and EUCAST/CLSI for amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, fluconazole, and voriconazole were &gt;89/&gt;93% and between MTS and EUCAST/CLSI were &gt;57/&gt;75%.

Topics & Concepts

Cryptococcus neoformansFlucytosineAmphotericin BVoriconazoleBroth microdilutionMicrobiologyFluconazoleBiologyAntifungalSerial dilutionMedicineMinimum inhibitory concentrationAntibioticsAlternative medicinePathologyFungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityNail Diseases and Treatments
Comparison of MIC Test Strip and Sensititre YeastOne with the CLSI and EUCAST Broth Microdilution Reference Methods for <i>In Vitro</i> Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Cryptococcus neoformans | Litcius