Litcius/Paper detail

Thoracoscopic Vertebral Body Tethering for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Ahmet Alanay, Altuğ Yücekul, Kadir Abul, Gökhan Ergene, Şahın Şenay, Binnaz Ay, Barbaros Omer Cebeci, Pınar Yalinay Dikmen, Tais Zulemyan, Yasemin Yavuz, Çağlar Yılgör

2020Spine96 citationsDOI

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: To report the follow-up curve behaviors in different Sanders staging groups. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a growth modulation technique that allows gradual spontaneous follow-up curve correction as the patient grows. There is a lack of scientific evidence regarding appropriate patient selection and timing of implantation. METHODS: Patients were grouped into five as: Sanders 1, 2, 3, 4-5, and 6-7. Data were collected preoperatively, at the day before discharge, and at each follow-up. Outcome measures were pulmonary and mechanical complications, readmission, and reoperation rates. Demographic, perioperative, clinical, radiographic, and complication data were compared using Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact tests for categorical variables and Kruskal-Wallis tests for the continuous variables. RESULTS: Thirty-one (29 F, 2 M) consecutive patients with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up were included. The mean age at surgery was 12.1 (10-14). The mean follow-up was 27.1 (12-62) months. The mean preoperative main thoracic curve magnitude was 47° ± 7.6°. For all curves, preoperative and first erect curve magnitudes, bending flexibility, and operative correction percentages were similar between groups (for all comparisons, P > 0.05). The median height gained during follow-up was different between groups (P < 0.001), which was reflected into median curve correction during follow-up. Total curve correction percentage was different between groups (P = 0.009). Four (12.9%) patients had pulmonary and six (19.4%) had mechanical complications. One (3.2%) patient required readmission and two (6.5%) required reoperation. Occurrence of pulmonary complications was similar in Sanders groups (P = 0.804), while mechanical complications and overcorrection was significantly higher in Sanders 2 patients (P = 0.002 and P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Follow-up curve behavior after VBT is different in patients having different Sanders stages. Sanders 2 patients experienced more overcorrection, thus timing and/or correction should be adjusted, since Sanders 3, 4, and 5 patients displayed a lesser risk of mechanical complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineIdiopathic scoliosisContinuous variableSurgeryScoliosisPerioperativeRetrospective cohort studyRadiographyArea under the curveComplicationInternal medicineScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesCervical and Thoracic Myelopathy