High-flow nasal cannula compared with continuous positive airway pressure: a bench and physiological study
Fernando Nataniel Vieira, Frank Silva Bezerra, Rémi Coudroy, Annia Schreiber, Irene Telías, Sebastián Dubó, Giulia Cavalot, Sérgio M. Pereira, Thomas Piraino, Laurent Brochard
Abstract
O with mouth open; p<0.001. When increasing HFNC flow, respiratory rate decreased by lengthening expiratory time, tidal volume did not change, and effort decreased (pressure-time product of the respiratory muscles); at 40L/min, effort was equivalent between CPAP and HFNC40L/min and became lower at 60L/min (p=0.045). During HFNC with mouth closed, and not during CPAP, resistance to breathing was increased, mostly during expiration. In conclusion, mouth closure during HFNC induces a positive nasopharyngeal pressure proportional to flow rate and an increase in expiratory resistance that might explain the prolonged expiration and reduction in respiratory rate and effort, and contribute to physiological benefits.