Impacts of Active Versus Passive Re‐Wetting on the Carbon Balance of a Previously Drained Bog
Marion Nyberg, T. Andrew Black, Rick Ketler, Sung‐Ching Lee, Mark S. Johnson, Markus Merkens, Kelly A. Nugent, Sara Knox
Abstract
Abstract Peatland drainage depletes large carbon stocks by increasing carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions from the soil. Restoration via re‐wetting could play an important role in climate change mitigation, reducing CO 2 emissions and increasing C storage within peatlands. However, re‐wetting leads to a biogeochemical compromise between increased CO 2 uptake, and enhanced methane (CH 4 ) release. The extent of this compromise in re‐wetted ecosystems with differing environmental conditions is uncertain. To assess re‐wetting effects, we analyzed eddy‐covariance flux measurements from a temperate bog near Vancouver, Canada, from two sites that have undergone different restoration techniques. By the end of the 1‐year study period, the actively re‐wetted, wetter site, was a weak CO 2 sink (−26.1 ± 6.1 g C‐CO 2 m −2 ), and the passively re‐wetted, drier site, was near CO 2 neutral (3.8 ± 3.1 g C‐CO 2 m −2 ). Higher CH 4 emissions at the wetter site led to a larger radiative balance on 20‐ and 100‐year time horizons, implying that the strong radiative effect of CH 4 can offset CO 2 sink strength on shorter to medium timeframes. However, long‐term radiative forcing (RF) modeling suggests sustained CO 2 uptake by the wetter site will eventually lead to a cooling effect on the climate. Furthermore, modeling results emphasize that despite both re‐wetted peatland sites having a positive RF over century timescales, the lack of restoration would have resulted in a significantly larger RF beyond the first few decades following restoration. Results highlight the importance of actively re‐wetting disturbed peatlands to mitigate climate warming and can be used to inform management decisions.