Litcius/Paper detail

Safety Guardrails for LLM-Enabled Robots

Zachary Ravichandran, Alexander Robey, Vijay Kumar, George J. Pappas, Hamed Hassani

2026IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters6 citationsDOI

Abstract

Although the integration of large language models (LLMs) into robotics has unlocked transformative capabilities, it has also introduced significant safety concerns, ranging from average-case LLM errors (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">e.g.,</i> hallucinations) to adversarial jailbreaking attacks, which can produce harmful robot behavior in real-world settings. Traditional robot safety approaches do not address the contextual vulnerabilities of LLMs, and current LLM safety approaches overlook the physical risks posed by robots operating in real-world environments. To ensure the safety of LLM-enabled robots, we propose <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">RoboGuard</small>, a two-stage guardrail architecture. <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">RoboGuard</small> first contextualizes pre-defined safety rules by grounding them in the robot's environment using a root-of-trust LLM. This LLM is shielded from malicious prompts and employs chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to generate context-dependent safety specifications, such as temporal logic constraints. <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">RoboGuard</small> then resolves conflicts between these contextual safety specifications and potentially unsafe plans using temporal logic control synthesis, ensuring compliance while minimally violating user preferences. In simulation and real-world experiments that consider worst-case jailbreaking attacks, <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">RoboGuard</small> reduces the execution of unsafe plans from over 92% to below 3% without compromising performance on safe plans. We also demonstrate that <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">RoboGuard</small> is resource-efficient, robust against adaptive attacks, and enhanced by its root-of-trust LLM's CoT reasoning. These results demonstrate the potential of <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">RoboGuard</small> to mitigate the safety risks and enhance the reliability of LLM-enabled robots.

Topics & Concepts

RobotRoboticsComputer scienceEngineeringReliability (semiconductor)Adversarial systemArtificial intelligenceTransformative learningGroundComputer securitySystem safetyRisk analysis (engineering)Key (lock)Control logicPlan (archaeology)Control (management)Remote controlIsolation (microbiology)Human–robot interactionCommon groundTransportation Safety and Impact AnalysisSafety Systems Engineering in AutonomyAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Safety Guardrails for LLM-Enabled Robots | Litcius