A pilot randomized sham controlled trial of bilateral iTBS for depression and executive function in older adults
Pilar Cristancho, Jyoti Arora, Tomoyuki Nishino, Jacinda Berger, Alexandre Carter, Daniel M. Blumberger, Philip Miller, Abraham Z. Snyder, Deanna M. Barch, Eric J. Lenze
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Executive function deficits (EFD) in late life depression (LLD) are associated with poor outcomes. Dysfunction of the cognitive control network (CCN) has been posited in the pathophysiology of LLD with EFD. Methods Seventeen older adults with depression and EFD were randomized to iTBS or sham for 6 weeks. Intervention was delivered bilaterally using a recognized connectivity target. Results A total of 89% (17/19) participants completed all study procedures. No serious adverse events occurred. Pre to post‐intervention change in mean Montgomery‐Asberg‐depression scores was not different between iTBS or sham, p = 0.33. No significant group‐by‐time interaction for Montgomery‐Asberg Depression rating scale scores ( F 3, 44 = 0.51; p = 0.67) was found. No significant differences were seen in the effects of time between the two groups on executive measures: Flanker scores ( F 1, 14 = 0.02, p = 0.88), Dimensional‐change‐card‐sort scores F 1, 14 = 0.25, p = 0.63, and working memory scores ( F 1, 14 = 0.98, p = 0.34). The Group‐by‐time interaction effect for functional connectivity (FC) within the Fronto‐parietal‐network was not significant ( F 1, 14 = 0.36, p = 0.56). No significant difference in the effect‐of‐time between the two groups was found on FC within the Cingulo‐opercular‐network ( F 1, 14 = 0, p = 0.98). Conclusion Bilateral iTBS is feasible in LLD. Preliminary results are unsupportive of efficacy on depression, executive function or target engagement of the CCN. A future Randomized clinical trial requires a larger sample size with stratification of cognitive and executive variables and refinement in the target engagement.