Accuracy of Emergency Physicians for Detection of Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities in Patients With Chest Pain Without <scp>ST‐Elevation</scp> Myocardial Infarction
Caner Sağlam, Erden Erol Ünlüer, Nalan Gökçe Çelebi Yamanoğlu, Pınar Kara, Emek Ediboğlu, Rami Bektaşlı, Shikha Tandon, Hayriye Gönüllü
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of emergency physicians (EPs) in the detection of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) using focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) in patients suspected of non-having ST-elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with chest pain. Three EPs underwent didactics and hands-on-training, of 3 hours each, by an experienced cardiologist, on detecting RWMAs using 2-dimensional echocardiography. They performed a FOCUS examination to evaluate for RWMAs and recorded the echo images. Our reference standard for the detection of RWMAs was accepted as a blinded cardiologist review of the prerecorded video clips. We calculated the corrected sample size and inter-rater agreement between the EPs (82 and 0.83, respectively). The analysis of the study was performed on 89 patients. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients with chest pain were screened. Emergency physicians demonstrated the detection of RWMAs with good sensitivity and even excellent specificity: 76.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.4%- 91.0%) and 92.1% (95% CI, 82.4%-97.4%), respectively. The accuracy of FOCUS was 87.6% (95% CI, 79.0%-93.7%). The area under the curve from a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, which evaluated the EPs' rate of detecting the presence or absence of RWMAs, was 0.845 (95% CI, 0.753-0.913). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results suggest that EPs with training in bedside echocardiography can accurately rule in patients with RWMAs in suspected non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction cases.