Litcius/Paper detail

Reflection and synthesis: How moral agents learn and moral cultures evolve

Joanna Burch‐Brown

2021Journal of Philosophy of Education20 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract One aim of moral education is to help society progress from morally imperfect conventions towards more perfect ones. According to a popular view, reflecting judgment is the vehicle of this progress. In this paper, I argue that although reflection is important, it is not enough; moral development also requires practical synthesis. Moral development takes place by securing new connections—conceptual, affective, volitional and behavioural—that bring thoughts, feelings, motivations and actions into alignment with higher reason, to instantiate respect for all who are ends in themselves. Constructing parallels from Kant's theoretical philosophy, I identify three kinds of synthesis that are central to moral practice. If I am right, then a key task for moral education is to support the development of these capacities of practical synthesis.

Topics & Concepts

ImperfectParallelsMoral disengagementFeelingReflection (computer programming)Moral developmentMoral reasoningEpistemologySocial cognitive theory of moralityMoral educationTask (project management)PsychologyMoral psychologyMoral imperativeKey (lock)SociologySocial psychologyPhilosophyPedagogyComputer scienceMechanical engineeringProgramming languageManagementComputer securityLinguisticsEconomicsEngineeringPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEthics in Business and EducationPolitical Philosophy and Ethics
Reflection and synthesis: How moral agents learn and moral cultures evolve | Litcius