Observational learning in simulation-based social work education: comparison of interviewers and observers
Kenta Asakura, Barbara Lee, Katherine Occhiuto, Toula Kourgiantakis
Abstract
Simulation-based learning is gaining attention in social work education. While research suggests clear pedagogical benefits for those who engage simulated clients as interviewers, little is known about the learning processes among observers of simulation teaching. Using social learning and social cognitive theories as a theoretical framework, we examined observational learning in simulation by comparing the experiences of students who participated as an interviewer versus students who participated as an observer. An online survey was administered to Bachelor and Master of Social Work students (N = 66) to collect quantitative and qualitative responses (N = 107) about their learning experience from the perspective of either an interviewer or an observer. Quantitative analyses revealed that interviewers perceived simulation with SCs to be more beneficial to their clinical learning compared to observers. No other differences were found between the two groups. A thematic analysis of qualitative data showed the following three unique learning processes among observers: (1) emotional distance from practice, (2) observation of the relationship between theory and practice, and (3) vicarious learning from peers. Results suggest that educators leverage student learning opportunities in observing roles and actively engage them during simulation debriefing sessions. Implications for simulation-based education and further research are discussed.