FAPI Compared with FDG PET/CT for Diagnosis of Primary and Metastatic Lung Cancer
Yuchun Wei, Li Ma, Pei Li, Jie Lu, Jiazhong Ren, Shoumei Yan, Hongbo Wu, Shuanghu Yuan, Zheng Fu, Jinming Yu
Abstract
Background The radiotracer fluorine 18 (18F)–labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) has shown promise for visualizing several types of cancer, but the accuracy of 18F-FAPI compared with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for the detection of lung cancer remains uncertain. Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness of 18F-FAPI–based PET/CT imaging for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lung cancer lesions as compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT. Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of a prospective trial, consecutively recruited patients from a single center with pathologically confirmed lung cancer were prospectively enrolled from December 2020 to April 2022 and underwent paired 18F-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations at intervals of more than 20 hours and within 7 days of each other. Histopathologic and clinical follow-up results were used as reference standards for final diagnoses. 18F-FAPI and 18F-FDG uptake were compared using the McNemar test or paired Student t test. Diagnostic accuracy was compared between the two techniques by using the McNemar χ2 test. Results Sixty-eight participants (median age, 63 years [IQR, 58–68 years; range, 42–79 years]; 46 male [68%]) were evaluated. Compared with the mean tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) for FDG uptake, TBR for FAPI uptake was lower in primary lung tumors (25.3 ± 14.0 [SD] vs 32.1 ± 21.1; P < .001) but higher in metastatic lymph nodes (7.5 ± 6.6 vs 5.9 ± 8.6; P < .001) and bone metastases (8.6 ± 5.4 vs 4.3 ± 2.3; P < .001). For diagnostic accuracy in a total of 548 lesions in 68 participants, compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated a higher sensitivity (99% [392 of 397 lesions] vs 87% [346 of 397]; P < .001), specificity (93% [141 of 151 lesions] vs 79% [120 of 151]; P = .004), accuracy (97% [533 of 548 lesions] vs 85% [466 of 548]; P < .001), and negative predictive value (97% [141 of 146 lesions] vs 70% [120 of 171 lesions]; P < .001), but there was no evidence of a difference for positive predictive value (98% [392 of 402 lesions] vs 92% [346 of 377 lesions]; P = .57). Conclusion 18F-FAPI PET/CT may be superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting lung cancer. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Zukotynski and Gerbaudo in this issue.