Litcius/Paper detail

Characterizing Performance of Freshwater Wetland Methane Models Across Time Scales at FLUXNET‐CH <sub>4</sub> Sites Using Wavelet Analyses

Zhen Zhang, Sheel Bansal, Kuang‐Yu Chang, Etienne Fluet‐Chouinard, Kyle Delwiche, Mathias Goeckede, A. F. Gustafson, Sara Knox, Antti Leppänen, Licheng Liu, Jinxun Liu, Avni Malhotra, Tiina Markkanen, Gavin McNicol, Joe R. Melton, Paul Miller, Changhui Peng, Maarit Raivonen, W. J. Riley, Oliver Sonnentag, Tuula Aalto, Rodrigo Vargas, Wenxin Zhang, Qing Zhu, Qiuan Zhu, Qianlai Zhuang, Lisamarie Windham‐Myers, Robert B. Jackson, Benjamin Poulter

2023Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences18 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Process‐based land surface models are important tools for estimating global wetland methane (CH 4 ) emissions and projecting their behavior across space and time. So far there are no performance assessments of model responses to drivers at multiple time scales. In this study, we apply wavelet analysis to identify the dominant time scales contributing to model uncertainty in the frequency domain. We evaluate seven wetland models at 23 eddy covariance tower sites. Our study first characterizes site‐level patterns of freshwater wetland CH 4 fluxes (FCH 4 ) at different time scales. A Monte Carlo approach was developed to incorporate flux observation error to avoid misidentification of the time scales that dominate model error. Our results suggest that (a) significant model‐observation disagreements are mainly at multi‐day time scales (&lt;15 days); (b) most of the models can capture the CH 4 variability at monthly and seasonal time scales (&gt;32 days) for the boreal and Arctic tundra wetland sites but have significant bias in variability at seasonal time scales for temperate and tropical/subtropical sites; (c) model errors exhibit increasing power spectrum as time scale increases, indicating that biases at time scales &lt;5 days could contribute to persistent systematic biases on longer time scales; and (d) differences in error pattern are related to model structure (e.g., proxy of CH 4 production). Our evaluation suggests the need to accurately replicate FCH 4 variability, especially at short time scales, in future wetland CH 4 model developments.

Topics & Concepts

Environmental scienceEddy covarianceReplicateWetlandTundraTemporal scalesClimatologyAtmospheric sciencesStatisticsArcticEcologyMathematicsEcosystemGeologyBiologyAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyClimate variability and models
Characterizing Performance of Freshwater Wetland Methane Models Across Time Scales at FLUXNET‐CH <sub>4</sub> Sites Using Wavelet Analyses | Litcius