The chronic effects of polyethylene terephthalate and biodegradable polyhydroxybutyrate microplastics on Daphnia magna

Abstract

The inappropriate disposal of plastic materials and their slow decomposition into microplastics (MP) pollutes aquatic ecosystems, leading to toxic effects on organisms. MP can have different shapes and be made from different polymeric materials; being carbon-based polymers the common ones. The toxicity associated with such MP has led to the need to search for alternative polymers with faster degradation times. Biodegradable polymers such as polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) are promising substitutes for synthetic polymers. In this work, the environmental impact of PHB was determined and compared to that of polyethylene terephthalate (PET). For this purpose, the model organism Daphnia magna was used in a 26-day experiment. The toxic effects of MPs was assessed by analysing the survival, the swimming velocity and the filtration rate of Daphnia magna . After 21 days of exposure, PET in the form of fibers or fragments caused the most toxicity, resulting in a 20% decrease in swimming velocity and a 20% of Daphnia magna survival. However, after 21 days, PHB resulted in 80% survival, which is comparable to control experiments, and Daphnia magna showed mobility that was comparable to that seen for control experiments. Therefore, with the presence of food PHB microplastic particles had no negative effects on Daphnia magna . Considering these results, PHB might be a promising material as a substitute of conventional polymers. • Microplastics of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) reduce the D. mag na filtration • PET in either fibres or fragments reduce D. magna swimming velocity • Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) did not alter neither D.magna filtration nor their mobility • PHB might be a suitable substitute to conventional plastic materials

Topics & Concepts