Litcius/Paper detail

Raising the bar: on the type, size and timeline of a ‘successful’ decoupling

Tere Vadén, Ville Lähde, Antti Majava, Paavo Järvensivu, Tero Toivanen, Jussi T. Eronen

2020Environmental Politics33 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Decoupling environmental ‘bads’ from economic ‘goods’ is a key part of policies such as green growth and circular economy that see economic growth as desirable or necessary, and also see that current use of natural resources and its environmental impacts is unsustainable. We estimate what a ‘successful decoupling’ (2% annual GDP growth and a decline in resource use by 2050 to a level that could be sustainable and compatible with a maximum 2°C global warming) would mean in terms of its type, timeline and size. Compared to 2017, ‘successful’ decoupling has to result in 2.6 times more GDP out of every ton of material use, including in-use material stocks. There are no realistic scenarios for such an increase in resource productivity.

Topics & Concepts

TimelineDecoupling (probability)Natural resource economicsEconomicsNatural resourceResource productivityRaising (metalworking)Environmental economicsGeographyMarket economyEcologyEngineeringResource allocationArchaeologyBiologyMechanical engineeringControl engineeringEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityClimate Change Policy and EconomicsGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Raising the bar: on the type, size and timeline of a ‘successful’ decoupling | Litcius