Litcius/Paper detail

Evaluating and mitigating the potential indirect effect of COVID-19 on control programmes for seven neglected tropical diseases: a modelling study

Anna Borlase, Epke A. Le Rutte, Soledad Castaño, David J. Blok, Jaspreet Toor, Federica Giardina, Emma L. Davis, Maryam Aliee, Roy M. Anderson, Diepreye Ayabina, María‐Gloria Basáñez, Seth Blumberg, Rocio Caja Rivera, Nakul Chitnis, Luc E. Coffeng, Christopher N. Davis, Michael Deiner, Peter J. Diggle, Claudio Fronterrè, Emanuele Giorgi, Matthew Graham, Jonathan I. D. Hamley, T. Déirdre Hollingsworth, Matt J. Keeling, Klodeta Kura, Thomas M. Lietman, Veronica Malizia, Graham F. Medley, Edwin Michael, Samuel M. Thumbi, Nyamai Mutono, Travis C. Porco, Joaquín M. Prada, Kat S. Rock, Swarnali Sharma, Simon E. F. Spencer, Wilma A. Stolk, Panayiota Touloupou, Andreia Vasconcelos, Carolin Vegvari, Sake J. de Vlas

2022The Lancet Global Health30 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In line with movement restrictions and physical distancing essential for the control of the COVID-19 pandemic, WHO recommended postponement of all neglected tropical disease (NTD) control activities that involve community-based surveys, active case finding, and mass drug administration in April, 2020. Following revised guidance later in 2020, and after interruptions to NTD programmes of varying lengths, NTD programmes gradually restarted in the context of an ongoing pandemic. However, ongoing challenges and service gaps have been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the potential effect of the programmatic interruptions and strategies to mitigate this effect. METHODS: For seven NTDs, namely soil-transmitted helminths, schistosomiasis, lymphatic filariasis, onchocerciasis, trachoma, visceral leishmaniasis, and human African trypanosomiasis, we used mathematical transmission models to simulate the effect of programme interruptions on the dynamics of each of these diseases in different endemic settings. We also explored the potential benefit of implementing mitigation strategies, primarily in terms of minimising the delays to control targets. FINDINGS: We show that the effect of the COVID-19-induced interruption in terms of delay to achieving elimination goals might in some cases be much longer than the duration of the interruption. For schistosomiasis, onchocerciasis, trachoma, and visceral leishmaniasis, a mean delay of 2-3 years for a 1-year interruption is predicted in areas of highest prevalence. We also show that these delays can largely be mitigated by measures such as additional mass drug administration or enhanced case-finding. INTERPRETATION: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought infectious disease control to the forefront of global consciousness. It is essential that the NTDs, so long neglected in terms of research and financial support, are not overlooked, and remain a priority in health service planning and funding. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Medical Research Council, and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office.

Topics & Concepts

Neglected tropical diseasesOnchocerciasisTrachomaLymphatic filariasisTropical diseasePandemicContext (archaeology)MedicineEnvironmental healthDisease EradicationTransmission (telecommunications)SanitationDiseaseImmunologyGeographyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)FilariasisInfectious disease (medical specialty)EngineeringArchaeologyPathologyElectrical engineeringHelminthsParasites and Host InteractionsParasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Evaluating and mitigating the potential indirect effect of COVID-19 on control programmes for seven neglected tropical diseases: a modelling study | Litcius